Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us


Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.


Submit news and opinion for publication


Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.


Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin

News from the Caribbean:

Back To Today's News

Commentary: Debt strangling a Caribbean generation
Published on May 5, 2017 Email To Friend    Print Version

By Sir Ronald Sanders

There is a real prospect that, in dealing with unsustainable debt, 11 of 13 Caribbean small states will have lost the first three decades of the 21st century, and foregone opportunities for poverty reduction, transformation and growth.

Sir Ronald Sanders is Antigua and Barbuda’s Ambassador to the US and the OAS. He is also a Senior Fellow at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London and Massey College in the University of Toronto. The views expressed are his own. Reponses to:
That judgement has been made by a leading development-economist who has studied and worked on small economies. Cyrus Rustomjee is a South African-born, former head of the Economic Affairs Division of the Commonwealth Secretariat. In that position, he produced well-considered papers for the G20 on the development challenges confronting developing countries.

His recent study, “Pathways through the silent crisis: Innovations to Resolve Unsustainable Caribbean Public Debt”, was commissioned by the Centre for International Governance, an independent think-tank located in Canada.

Losing “the first three decades of the 21st century” is a grim prospect. That’s practically an entire generation of Caribbean people. As Rustomjee points out, the problem is not that debt accumulation and debt servicing pose an intrinsic threat to poverty reduction, growth and development; but unsustainable high debt and debt servicing levels do.

Promoting development by raising loans has been a useful tool for many countries throughout history. Judicious levels of debt have contributed to growth through their investment in productive enterprises that produced revenue streams to repay borrowings. But when debt is used to pay for recurrent expenditures from which there is no return, the level rises with no means of repayment.

The cost of debt service has become so high that it severely constrains the spending capacity of governments to provide goods and services immediately needed by their people, and to invest in projects for economic growth.

Both the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank have suggested that a debt to GDP ratio above 60 percent is dangerous, since debt servicing would absorb such a high portion of revenues that governments would be left with little to provide the goods and services their people expect. And that is precisely the problem that many Caribbean governments face.

As the situation stands, at the end of 2016, only two of the 14 independent Caribbean Community (CARICOM) countries had debt to GDP ratios under 60 percent – Guyana and Haiti. The 12 with ratios over 60 percent were: Antigua and Barbuda 92.1 percent, Bahamas 66.9 percent, Barbados 107.9 percent, Belize 98.6 percent, Dominica 81 percent, Grenada 84.4 percent, Jamaica 115.2 percent, St Kitts-Nevis 65.8 percent, St Lucia 82.6 percent, St Vincent and The Grenadines 79.2 percent, Suriname 64.6 percent and Trinidad and Tobago 61 percent.

Troublingly, six of these countries experienced an increase in their debt to GDP ratios over their 2015 performance. Those countries are: Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, St Lucia, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago.

The causes of the high debt to GDP ratios in Caribbean countries are many; poor policy choices by some governments are among them. But, it is important to note that in seven of the largest debtor countries, Rustomjee’s study shows that debt rose due to the following things: infrastructure reconstruction after natural disasters; reduction in aid; little or no access to concessional financing, forcing governments to borrow on tough commercial terms; erosion of European Union trade preferences since the early 1990s; and the impact on tourism of the global economic crisis which began in 2008.

He might have added the region’s large annual trade deficit with the United States, its largest trading partner, which reached US$5.2 billion in 2016 with a serious decline in Caribbean exports, including under the duty-free provisions for some goods of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act.

Indeed, were it not for low-cost loans and grants particularly from China and Venezuela, and also from Taiwan in respect of three of them, the circumstances of these countries would have been much worse.

Projections are that, on its present course, by 2020, debt will remain unsustainable in 11 Caribbean small states, and there will be no change in 2030 when the UN’s Agenda for Sustainable Development will have run its course.

Unless the international community responds appropriately to this grave problem, these countries will not only lose the first three decades of the 21st century, thereby witnessing a reversal in the advances they have made, but poverty and unemployment will increase and opportunities for economic growth will by-pass them.

Other countries in the region will not be immune from the consequences. All reside in the same neighbourhood, and none can pick-up itself to move to a more desirable location. The adverse consequences in one will spill over into the others, in the form of economic refugees, job seekers and crime. This trend has already begun.

As bad as it may seem, the problem of high debt to GDP ratios is not insurmountable. But, it requires creative thinking and commitment from governments and the international community, including re-opening concessional financing from international financial institutions; external creditors, agreeing to write-off or reduce their loans; governments setting an annual cap on borrowing; and swapping debt for climate change adaptation and mitigation.

Caribbean countries with high debt to GDP ratios are not without sound argument to encourage international responsiveness to their plight. These countries did not create climate change; they are the victims of the profligacy of the industrialised nations but they have to pay for reconstruction by incurring debt. Further, they are markets for the goods and services of others with little compensation. And, some of the debt they acquired was used to fight drug trafficking that contributed to the well-being of others.

Regrettably, there has been no promotion of such international cooperation, largely because, so far, Caribbean countries have soldiered-on, maintaining political and social stability and avoiding economic calamity. And the region itself has done little to place the issue on the international agenda and argue it forcefully.

The contention will be made that CARICOM countries must first show themselves willing to reduce their debt. Well six countries did so in 2016: Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, Jamaica, St Kitts-Nevis and St Vincent and the Grenadines reduced their debt from the previous years. Their effort has shown what is possible, and as the catalyst for encouraging an international response, it has to be replicated across the region particularly by the six whose debt to GDP ratios increased.

The alternative is to strangle a generation.

© Copyright to this article is held by Sir Ronald Sanders and its reproduction or republication by any media or transmission by radio or television without his prior written permission is an infringement of the law. Republished with permission.
Reads: 7980

Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



C. ben-David:

It boggles the mind that neither you nor Cyrus Rustomjee include one of the key reasons for this indebtedness, namely, reckless borrowing by power-hungry Caribbean leaders to fund profligate projects to boast their electoral prospects, the latest example being the needless construction of Argyle International Airport in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

The descendants of the political and intellectual elites who clamoured for power (and control of the treasury) beginning in the 1950s are now hypocritically crying poverty and dependency so they can reclaim their voluntarily surrendered iron rice bowl.

And you are leading the charge in this movement.

Loubeth Nyack:

I would argue that our debt crisis began with the Atlantic Slave trade. In the fields of cotton, sugar cane and other.

The African kidnapped and transported to the Caribbean region to worked from the sun up to sun down on the European planters plantation without pay. At the end of the slave trade European planters were compensated by their various government, for example, Britain, whilst no back pay or compensation were given to the African slave labourers. Undoubtedly, during the colonial occupation coupled with pseudo-independence, the islands were faced with dire poverty, illiteracy and a myriad of political and social degradation. At worst there were no monies in the treasury, therefore the newly independent nations had no wherewithal to look after their children, namely citizens of the various islands. When it comes to social welfare and employment, national security how was it possible to develop a stable and sustainable economy without borrowing?

Arguably, Caribbean island debts should be written off my all its colonial masters whose industrial and financial economy grew and developed as result of the finance accrued by theft and fraudulent practices namely 'The illegal Transatlantic trade'. Political pundits and leaders of the region, ought to call to charge the European nations, serve them with a writ and demand compensation with interest for 300 years back pay that is still owed to the Caribbean African Diaspora. This is n initiative that the UN should launch. But would they? How could they? Are not many of its elitist member countries guilty of the 'Trans-Atlantic Inhumane, illegal trade in African Humans from the 15th to the 18th century?

There is a western saying, 'There is no free lunch'. Well, Europea has had 300 years of free lunch paid for by African kidnapped, converted slaves. It is high time the IOU is cashed in.

As said my Malcolm X the chicken comes home to roost.


As a result of our comments feature being overtaken in recent weeks by spammers using fake email addresses, producing a large number of bounced verification emails each day, we have reluctantly decided to suspend the comments section until further notice.

User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Other Headlines:

Regional Sports: